<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ULTRAsomething photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Long Look at a Widelux (Part 2) by Tim Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/05/a-long-look-at-a-widelux-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5807</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=7660#comment-5807</guid>
		<description>Your shots also make me miss Vancouver!  One of the most beautiful cities on earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your shots also make me miss Vancouver!  One of the most beautiful cities on earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Long Look at a Widelux (Part 2) by Tim Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/05/a-long-look-at-a-widelux-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5806</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=7660#comment-5806</guid>
		<description>Gregory,  

Thanks so much for this in-depth review.  Was exactly what I needed after buying my first Widelux F7.  Very Helpful!  I love this camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregory,  </p>
<p>Thanks so much for this in-depth review.  Was exactly what I needed after buying my first Widelux F7.  Very Helpful!  I love this camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Riffing in the Key of Ricoh by jason</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/10/riffing-in-the-key-of-ricoh/comment-page-1/#comment-5782</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8389#comment-5782</guid>
		<description>Update
Now proud owner of A12 unit. Traveled 120miles to collect as did not want to risk the post. Well worth it. Great piece of kit. Just need some nice light to really have a play. Leica glass, manual focus and cam takes care of exposure. Sort of too easy. Only problem, I need some wider (contextual) glass. Do like the seemingly infinitely variable exposure settings. 
Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update<br />
Now proud owner of A12 unit. Traveled 120miles to collect as did not want to risk the post. Well worth it. Great piece of kit. Just need some nice light to really have a play. Leica glass, manual focus and cam takes care of exposure. Sort of too easy. Only problem, I need some wider (contextual) glass. Do like the seemingly infinitely variable exposure settings.<br />
Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Poe than Van Gogh by f/Egor: Shooting Through the Wormhole &#171; The Leica Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/03/more-poe-than-van-gogh/comment-page-1/#comment-5769</link>
		<dc:creator>f/Egor: Shooting Through the Wormhole &#171; The Leica Camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=7433#comment-5769</guid>
		<description>[...] as each tends to pick a side and adhere to it at all cost. Last year, in an article entitled More Poe than Van Gogh, I proposed an alternative view that generated substantial internet discussion, but ultimately did [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as each tends to pick a side and adhere to it at all cost. Last year, in an article entitled More Poe than Van Gogh, I proposed an alternative view that generated substantial internet discussion, but ultimately did [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alaskan Cruise Photo Gear Guide by Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2009/08/alaskan-cruise-photo-gear-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-5744</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=3747#comment-5744</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info.  Just got the word that we may be on an Alaska cruise soon so just starting my research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.  Just got the word that we may be on an Alaska cruise soon so just starting my research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rainy Days and Mondays by Egor</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/11/rainy-days-and-mondays/comment-page-1/#comment-5596</link>
		<dc:creator>Egor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8681#comment-5596</guid>
		<description>Aaron: Thanks for the message. I can assure you I&#039;m not edging closer to the middle. Rather, in the case of the Pentax, I like to think the middle is edging closer to me...

I&#039;m certainly not &quot;SLR man,&quot; but the Pentax definitely has some intriguing features. Besides the weather sealing (essential for any Pacific Northwest photographer), I really like its TAv mode, which allows me to manually set BOTH the shutter speed and aperture, and the camera simply adjusts the ISO -- this is the first form of auto-exposure I&#039;ve ever found worthwhile on a camera, since it mirrors the way I often work when doing full manual exposure with digital cameras (that is, I prefer to tweak the ISO as needed, leaving both the shutter speed and aperture unchanged).

I&#039;m really hoping, now that Ricoh owns Pentax, that they consider bringing weather sealing and TAv mode into the next generation of GXR cameras... that would be more than enough to make me sell the K-5. Also, Ricoh has hinted they&#039;ll be adding a Pentax mount sensor to the GXR line, which means my small collection of 40 year old Pentax lenses (which I acquired for the K-5) will make the transition from K-5 to GXR). So, as you see, there is still a touch of logical madness being applied to this seemingly mundane purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron: Thanks for the message. I can assure you I&#8217;m not edging closer to the middle. Rather, in the case of the Pentax, I like to think the middle is edging closer to me&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly not &#8220;SLR man,&#8221; but the Pentax definitely has some intriguing features. Besides the weather sealing (essential for any Pacific Northwest photographer), I really like its TAv mode, which allows me to manually set BOTH the shutter speed and aperture, and the camera simply adjusts the ISO &#8212; this is the first form of auto-exposure I&#8217;ve ever found worthwhile on a camera, since it mirrors the way I often work when doing full manual exposure with digital cameras (that is, I prefer to tweak the ISO as needed, leaving both the shutter speed and aperture unchanged).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really hoping, now that Ricoh owns Pentax, that they consider bringing weather sealing and TAv mode into the next generation of GXR cameras&#8230; that would be more than enough to make me sell the K-5. Also, Ricoh has hinted they&#8217;ll be adding a Pentax mount sensor to the GXR line, which means my small collection of 40 year old Pentax lenses (which I acquired for the K-5) will make the transition from K-5 to GXR). So, as you see, there is still a touch of logical madness being applied to this seemingly mundane purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ruminations on a 50mm f/1.1 Nokton by stefano</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2010/08/ruminations-on-a-50mm-f1-1-nokton/comment-page-1/#comment-5360</link>
		<dc:creator>stefano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=6302#comment-5360</guid>
		<description>hello Gregory,
was checking out your blog and found this interesting review; if i didn&#039;t already have one, i would go out and buy this lens! i am REALLY happy to own it, and if i was ever forced for any reason to keep only ONE lens with my M8, this is the on i would keep!
i like these voigtlanders a lot; i think the value for money is unbeatable (now i have their 15, the 28, 50 and 75), and i think they are superb. yes, i do like the look i get from my 52 leica glass, but for everyday use these are the lenses to carry!
keep up the great work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Gregory,<br />
was checking out your blog and found this interesting review; if i didn&#8217;t already have one, i would go out and buy this lens! i am REALLY happy to own it, and if i was ever forced for any reason to keep only ONE lens with my M8, this is the on i would keep!<br />
i like these voigtlanders a lot; i think the value for money is unbeatable (now i have their 15, the 28, 50 and 75), and i think they are superb. yes, i do like the look i get from my 52 leica glass, but for everyday use these are the lenses to carry!<br />
keep up the great work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rainy Days and Mondays by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/11/rainy-days-and-mondays/comment-page-1/#comment-5346</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8681#comment-5346</guid>
		<description>grEGORy are you edging ever closer back to the middle?
Have you tired of the fringe and the rarefied air offerings from Leica, Ricoh and the like? I like Portland too but that that is the CLOSEST dealership for Ricoh *cough, cough* 
Shame really and certainly takes a &quot;special&quot; kind of person to make that kind of commitment. Of which you no doubt are...
Now Pentax, the proverbial David to the dueling Goliaths, now we&#039;re talking. As another commenter mentioned the value proposition for Pentax and in particular the thrill of old lenses...do they meter and confirm focus? I assume yes. Pentax always seemed to tip the hat to their storied past.

Your post has resurrected my interest in Pentax and made me think that maybe I too need to have a waterproof alternative...living in Vancouver and all. I don&#039;t but your post and that linked video (VERY cool!) has got me dreaming and isn&#039;t that what we all come to the blog trough for anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grEGORy are you edging ever closer back to the middle?<br />
Have you tired of the fringe and the rarefied air offerings from Leica, Ricoh and the like? I like Portland too but that that is the CLOSEST dealership for Ricoh *cough, cough*<br />
Shame really and certainly takes a &#8220;special&#8221; kind of person to make that kind of commitment. Of which you no doubt are&#8230;<br />
Now Pentax, the proverbial David to the dueling Goliaths, now we&#8217;re talking. As another commenter mentioned the value proposition for Pentax and in particular the thrill of old lenses&#8230;do they meter and confirm focus? I assume yes. Pentax always seemed to tip the hat to their storied past.</p>
<p>Your post has resurrected my interest in Pentax and made me think that maybe I too need to have a waterproof alternative&#8230;living in Vancouver and all. I don&#8217;t but your post and that linked video (VERY cool!) has got me dreaming and isn&#8217;t that what we all come to the blog trough for anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Riffing in the Key of Ricoh by Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/10/riffing-in-the-key-of-ricoh/comment-page-1/#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8389#comment-5326</guid>
		<description>GXR convert. What a tool. Classic case of internet stumbled upon. Never heard of it until found my way here. Now a proud owner. Have the cam and the P10 unit. The A12 M mount is simply unavailabe here at the moment due to floods etc in other parts of the world. Expected delivery Feb 2012 (ish) Can hardly wait. Given the P10 is perhaps the poor relation of the line I am cocker hoop with it. Even with updated firmware may still not be the quickest auto focus, but, more importantly, it has never missed focus. Snap mode, Love it. Aspect ratio, love it. Horizon checker, love it. Oh what joy to shoot square on demand. Customisability. Have not left home without it. The ability to go from macro to skyscape vista instantly what a tool. The P10 seems to cover most bases. Still looking forward to bolting on some M glass, but in the mean time, happy days. Has re-awoken the slumbering inner photographer. Shooting stuff now I would have walked past or worse simply missed.
Jason one happy bunny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GXR convert. What a tool. Classic case of internet stumbled upon. Never heard of it until found my way here. Now a proud owner. Have the cam and the P10 unit. The A12 M mount is simply unavailabe here at the moment due to floods etc in other parts of the world. Expected delivery Feb 2012 (ish) Can hardly wait. Given the P10 is perhaps the poor relation of the line I am cocker hoop with it. Even with updated firmware may still not be the quickest auto focus, but, more importantly, it has never missed focus. Snap mode, Love it. Aspect ratio, love it. Horizon checker, love it. Oh what joy to shoot square on demand. Customisability. Have not left home without it. The ability to go from macro to skyscape vista instantly what a tool. The P10 seems to cover most bases. Still looking forward to bolting on some M glass, but in the mean time, happy days. Has re-awoken the slumbering inner photographer. Shooting stuff now I would have walked past or worse simply missed.<br />
Jason one happy bunny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rainy Days and Mondays by Lester</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/11/rainy-days-and-mondays/comment-page-1/#comment-5276</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8681#comment-5276</guid>
		<description>Well, grEGORy nails this one for me.  I&#039;m just an enthusiastic amateur who likes snapping grandkids and flowers, so via the Minolta A2 and then a variety of acquired and subsequently rapidly discarded high-end compacts and &#039;bridge&#039; cameras from Canon, Nikon, Fuji, and Olympus, ended for while with the Panasonic MFTs -- G1, GH1, G2, and GH2.  The Pannys suited me very well, until the day it rained while I was really really trying to take some landscape shots I really really wanted to capture.  Rather than risk the gear, I packed it away, and was so annoyed when I got home that it all hit eBay that evening.  So, what to replace it with?  To my utter astonishment, while Canon and Nikon would loudly tell me about their weather-sealed bodies (I was quite ready to take either the 7D or the D7000), they were completely opaque about their lenses.  Sony was little better.  Olympus was much more up front, but I didn&#039;t care to go down the dying FT route.  Only Pentax set out a stall that made my choices clear and easy.  Purchased the K-5 a week later, with the 18-135, the 50 f1.4, and the 100 macro lenses, all WR.  Added the battery grip, also WR, when I got fed up with awkward portrait posture.  Have been very pleased.  As someone said on a forum, with the 7D and D7000 you get what Canikon decide to give you at that particular marketing price-point, while with the Pentax K-5 you get everything Pentax has, and at reasonable prices.  It has worked for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, grEGORy nails this one for me.  I&#8217;m just an enthusiastic amateur who likes snapping grandkids and flowers, so via the Minolta A2 and then a variety of acquired and subsequently rapidly discarded high-end compacts and &#8216;bridge&#8217; cameras from Canon, Nikon, Fuji, and Olympus, ended for while with the Panasonic MFTs &#8212; G1, GH1, G2, and GH2.  The Pannys suited me very well, until the day it rained while I was really really trying to take some landscape shots I really really wanted to capture.  Rather than risk the gear, I packed it away, and was so annoyed when I got home that it all hit eBay that evening.  So, what to replace it with?  To my utter astonishment, while Canon and Nikon would loudly tell me about their weather-sealed bodies (I was quite ready to take either the 7D or the D7000), they were completely opaque about their lenses.  Sony was little better.  Olympus was much more up front, but I didn&#8217;t care to go down the dying FT route.  Only Pentax set out a stall that made my choices clear and easy.  Purchased the K-5 a week later, with the 18-135, the 50 f1.4, and the 100 macro lenses, all WR.  Added the battery grip, also WR, when I got fed up with awkward portrait posture.  Have been very pleased.  As someone said on a forum, with the 7D and D7000 you get what Canikon decide to give you at that particular marketing price-point, while with the Pentax K-5 you get everything Pentax has, and at reasonable prices.  It has worked for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Black &amp; White Colors by shawn r.</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/12/black-and-white-colors/comment-page-1/#comment-5241</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn r.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8849#comment-5241</guid>
		<description>Nice post and well timed. I have been dragging my feet about doing a couple similar assignments and your post is prompting me to move them to the top of my list.  I really enjoyed hearing about your process and also that you struggled with it for a bit.  It is easy to forget that others struggle too.... it&#039;s not just me! :-)
cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post and well timed. I have been dragging my feet about doing a couple similar assignments and your post is prompting me to move them to the top of my list.  I really enjoyed hearing about your process and also that you struggled with it for a bit.  It is easy to forget that others struggle too&#8230;. it&#8217;s not just me! <img src='http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Black &amp; White Colors by Yeshua</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/12/black-and-white-colors/comment-page-1/#comment-5240</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8849#comment-5240</guid>
		<description>I very much enjoyed your comments here, Greg. I have been a long time proponent of black and white, but it wasn&#039;t until recently that I&#039;ve realized I need to be a good color photographer to be a good black and white photographer. Your blog post is a good reminder that sometimes, you need to be counter-intuitive to get strong results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much enjoyed your comments here, Greg. I have been a long time proponent of black and white, but it wasn&#8217;t until recently that I&#8217;ve realized I need to be a good color photographer to be a good black and white photographer. Your blog post is a good reminder that sometimes, you need to be counter-intuitive to get strong results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Going for a Spin by Egor</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/08/going-for-a-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-5227</link>
		<dc:creator>Egor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8087#comment-5227</guid>
		<description>Hi JMS:

There were actually several 360 degree cameras produced in the 1980&#039;s, many of which were quite expensive. But I suspect the one you might be thinking of is the Spinshot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JMS:</p>
<p>There were actually several 360 degree cameras produced in the 1980&#8242;s, many of which were quite expensive. But I suspect the one you might be thinking of is the Spinshot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Going for a Spin by jms</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/08/going-for-a-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-5226</link>
		<dc:creator>jms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8087#comment-5226</guid>
		<description>Someone made a camera just like this in the 1980s.  I still remember being shown it, but it was more expensive than I could afford.  Anyone know what I am talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone made a camera just like this in the 1980s.  I still remember being shown it, but it was more expensive than I could afford.  Anyone know what I am talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rainy Days and Mondays by greycoopers</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/11/rainy-days-and-mondays/comment-page-1/#comment-5211</link>
		<dc:creator>greycoopers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8681#comment-5211</guid>
		<description>How could this post NOT have attracted some comments?  C&#039;mon Pentax shooters - speak up and tell us how good your gear is!  &quot;Winter. Monday. Vancouver. #1&quot; has just elbowed its way into my Top 5 all time favourite list.  Rainy days or Mondays, this one makes me smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could this post NOT have attracted some comments?  C&#8217;mon Pentax shooters &#8211; speak up and tell us how good your gear is!  &#8220;Winter. Monday. Vancouver. #1&#8243; has just elbowed its way into my Top 5 all time favourite list.  Rainy days or Mondays, this one makes me smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Leica 21mm Super-Elmar-M by Egor</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/11/leica-21mm-super-elmar-m/comment-page-1/#comment-5160</link>
		<dc:creator>Egor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8050#comment-5160</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason:

The images here are exactly the same ones I provided to Leica. But I hear what you&#039;re saying -- I&#039;ve always thought my images looked somewhat soft on the Leica Blog, and I could never quite figure out why. After all, we&#039;re both using Wordpress to do the scaling. Maybe it just comes down to the fact that, on ULTRAsomething, Wordpress scales a 900 pixel image down to 750 pixels whereas, on the Leica Blog, Wordpress scales it down to 600 pixels or so.

I never got the chance to use this lens on the GXR, since I purchased the GXR long after I returned the lens to Leica. But I would really REALLY like to try it out on the GXR. Intuitively, I suspect it would be a winning combination…

... and while I&#039;m busy assuming things I don&#039;t actually know, I also suspect you&#039;re correct about the L39 adapter, though I can&#039;t say for certain. I&#039;ve never really understood what, exactly, the difference is between &quot;L39&quot; and &quot;M39&quot; lenses? To me, they&#039;re one and the same but, admittedly I might be wrong. In any event, I&#039;ve used screw mount lenses demarcated both &quot;M39&quot; and &quot;LTM&quot; on the GXR, and with only a single screw-to-M adapter. And, since you&#039;re looking &quot;through&quot; the lens with the GXR (using either the rear panel LCD or the external electronic viewfinder), you&#039;re correct in assuming frame lines are not a factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason:</p>
<p>The images here are exactly the same ones I provided to Leica. But I hear what you&#8217;re saying &#8212; I&#8217;ve always thought my images looked somewhat soft on the Leica Blog, and I could never quite figure out why. After all, we&#8217;re both using WordPress to do the scaling. Maybe it just comes down to the fact that, on ULTRAsomething, WordPress scales a 900 pixel image down to 750 pixels whereas, on the Leica Blog, WordPress scales it down to 600 pixels or so.</p>
<p>I never got the chance to use this lens on the GXR, since I purchased the GXR long after I returned the lens to Leica. But I would really REALLY like to try it out on the GXR. Intuitively, I suspect it would be a winning combination…</p>
<p>&#8230; and while I&#8217;m busy assuming things I don&#8217;t actually know, I also suspect you&#8217;re correct about the L39 adapter, though I can&#8217;t say for certain. I&#8217;ve never really understood what, exactly, the difference is between &#8220;L39&#8243; and &#8220;M39&#8243; lenses? To me, they&#8217;re one and the same but, admittedly I might be wrong. In any event, I&#8217;ve used screw mount lenses demarcated both &#8220;M39&#8243; and &#8220;LTM&#8221; on the GXR, and with only a single screw-to-M adapter. And, since you&#8217;re looking &#8220;through&#8221; the lens with the GXR (using either the rear panel LCD or the external electronic viewfinder), you&#8217;re correct in assuming frame lines are not a factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Leica 21mm Super-Elmar-M by Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/11/leica-21mm-super-elmar-m/comment-page-1/#comment-5159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8050#comment-5159</guid>
		<description>Hello egor.
Oh my! Not normally the sort of lens that floats my boat, but, ye gods. Stunning.
One observation that stood out to me was the look of your images on the Leica site vs this site. The images seem to have more punch here than on the Leica site. Subtle but it is there to my eyes when compared sdie by side. 
Have you dodged and burned some more of that egor magic on the images presented here?
Out of interest did you have the chance to bolt it on to the GXR?
As an aside am I correct in thinking given the GXR does not have a viewfinder then if you want to use an L39 lens you only need the one adaptor ring as you are not bringing up frame lines?
Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello egor.<br />
Oh my! Not normally the sort of lens that floats my boat, but, ye gods. Stunning.<br />
One observation that stood out to me was the look of your images on the Leica site vs this site. The images seem to have more punch here than on the Leica site. Subtle but it is there to my eyes when compared sdie by side.<br />
Have you dodged and burned some more of that egor magic on the images presented here?<br />
Out of interest did you have the chance to bolt it on to the GXR?<br />
As an aside am I correct in thinking given the GXR does not have a viewfinder then if you want to use an L39 lens you only need the one adaptor ring as you are not bringing up frame lines?<br />
Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wag the Blog by Egor</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/11/wag-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5147</link>
		<dc:creator>Egor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8563#comment-5147</guid>
		<description>Thanks to everyone who commented here, on Facebook and through email. It really helps to know which elements appeal to you, and what else you&#039;d like to see from ULTRAsomething. It&#039;s also encouraging to have confirmation that this blog is on the right path… though my accountant would likely disagree. For now, ULTRAsomething will continue to chug along as it has — following the photographic whims and philosophic flounderings of its author.

Going forward, should you read an occasional ULTRAsomething article that reeks of &quot;pandering to the masses,&quot; do not be alarmed. I&#039;m not selling out, but rather just fishing for readers who haven&#039;t yet discovered ULTRAsomething. ULTRAsomething will absolutely not change to conform to the masses. ULTRAsomething will always insist that the masses conform to it. Futile? Of course. But I wouldn&#039;t write this site any other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone who commented here, on Facebook and through email. It really helps to know which elements appeal to you, and what else you&#8217;d like to see from ULTRAsomething. It&#8217;s also encouraging to have confirmation that this blog is on the right path… though my accountant would likely disagree. For now, ULTRAsomething will continue to chug along as it has — following the photographic whims and philosophic flounderings of its author.</p>
<p>Going forward, should you read an occasional ULTRAsomething article that reeks of &#8220;pandering to the masses,&#8221; do not be alarmed. I&#8217;m not selling out, but rather just fishing for readers who haven&#8217;t yet discovered ULTRAsomething. ULTRAsomething will absolutely not change to conform to the masses. ULTRAsomething will always insist that the masses conform to it. Futile? Of course. But I wouldn&#8217;t write this site any other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wag the Blog by Leslie Mak</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/11/wag-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5138</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Mak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8563#comment-5138</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been re-reading your post and the comments above before leaving my own.  &quot;Quality, stimulating, motivating, well written, humorous, beautiful thought-provoking photos&quot; all resonate with me.  The reason for my delay in responding to your article is that I realize that I, like the others, find myself asking way too much of you – the self-financed, self-taught, and self-motivated photographer and blogger.  While most comments have picked up on the relative infrequency of your posts, and I too click on my “favourites” bar daily in the hope that another EGORian epistle has been dispatched, I am agog at the 82 substantial posts you have accumulated over less than 3 years.  Let’s be clear – these are not just “off-the-cuff dash-it-off-in 5-minutes” posts but each is a carefully constructed piece of prose, the result of days if not weeks of rumination and deliberation.  Moreover, each article (bar one) is accompanied by finely crafted and delicately post-processed photographs, included to illustrate a point or to accompany the narrative.  Rarely have I seen review articles illuminated by photos of such quality.  And the captions are themselves works of art (anyone crack “Big Yellow Taxi” yet?).

While the internet is teeming with photography blogs and websites offering news, articles on technique, and gear reviews, I am very grateful that ULTRAsomething provides me with a steady diet of philosophical articles, unashamedly subjective reviews, “road-less travelled” commentary, and inspiring photography.  In light of the mainstream rush towards sameness and mediocrity, I am daily astounded that you have not been snagged by an enlightened sponsor or corporate advertiser.  I abhor the notion that excellent content should be completely free.  And so I feel unable to ask for more than what you are already giving, so long as it is free.  But were there to be a way for myself and others to support your efforts with currency rather than comments, I’d love to hear you critique photographs you like (your own and those by others, maybe through a weekly post?), learn more about how you stay sharp and motivated, and read your thoughts about your favourite photographers, about photojournalism, publishing, hockey, politics, art history, the music industry, the bands you follow, banking…you get my drift.

I’ll stop here – lest my comments get longer than the post that provoked them.  Suffice to say that were you to add another monograph to keep instinct company (which I am very pleased to own and gladly recommend), or to offer an eBook or workshop, SIGN ME UP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been re-reading your post and the comments above before leaving my own.  &#8220;Quality, stimulating, motivating, well written, humorous, beautiful thought-provoking photos&#8221; all resonate with me.  The reason for my delay in responding to your article is that I realize that I, like the others, find myself asking way too much of you – the self-financed, self-taught, and self-motivated photographer and blogger.  While most comments have picked up on the relative infrequency of your posts, and I too click on my “favourites” bar daily in the hope that another EGORian epistle has been dispatched, I am agog at the 82 substantial posts you have accumulated over less than 3 years.  Let’s be clear – these are not just “off-the-cuff dash-it-off-in 5-minutes” posts but each is a carefully constructed piece of prose, the result of days if not weeks of rumination and deliberation.  Moreover, each article (bar one) is accompanied by finely crafted and delicately post-processed photographs, included to illustrate a point or to accompany the narrative.  Rarely have I seen review articles illuminated by photos of such quality.  And the captions are themselves works of art (anyone crack “Big Yellow Taxi” yet?).</p>
<p>While the internet is teeming with photography blogs and websites offering news, articles on technique, and gear reviews, I am very grateful that ULTRAsomething provides me with a steady diet of philosophical articles, unashamedly subjective reviews, “road-less travelled” commentary, and inspiring photography.  In light of the mainstream rush towards sameness and mediocrity, I am daily astounded that you have not been snagged by an enlightened sponsor or corporate advertiser.  I abhor the notion that excellent content should be completely free.  And so I feel unable to ask for more than what you are already giving, so long as it is free.  But were there to be a way for myself and others to support your efforts with currency rather than comments, I’d love to hear you critique photographs you like (your own and those by others, maybe through a weekly post?), learn more about how you stay sharp and motivated, and read your thoughts about your favourite photographers, about photojournalism, publishing, hockey, politics, art history, the music industry, the bands you follow, banking…you get my drift.</p>
<p>I’ll stop here – lest my comments get longer than the post that provoked them.  Suffice to say that were you to add another monograph to keep instinct company (which I am very pleased to own and gladly recommend), or to offer an eBook or workshop, SIGN ME UP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wag the Blog by ChristopheD</title>
		<link>http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2011/11/wag-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-5134</link>
		<dc:creator>ChristopheD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 07:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/?p=8563#comment-5134</guid>
		<description>I would tend to repeat what was said in earlier comments. I will try not to.
What I appreciate when visiting your blog (which I do on a regular basis) is reading (ultra)something that is likely to help me in making photos, in understanding why one makes photos (you, me, other photographers), in giving new ideas, etc.
I&#039;m not really fond of articles on photo gears (there so many pseudo technical blogs on the net) except if it is about using a different gear to make different photos.
I appreciate your opinions on your photos; I would appreciate your opinion on others&#039;. It&#039;s good to enter into a photographer&#039;s mind!
Thank you for this blog, go on, don&#039;t change too much, keep its spirit as it is.
Kind regards,
Christophe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to repeat what was said in earlier comments. I will try not to.<br />
What I appreciate when visiting your blog (which I do on a regular basis) is reading (ultra)something that is likely to help me in making photos, in understanding why one makes photos (you, me, other photographers), in giving new ideas, etc.<br />
I&#8217;m not really fond of articles on photo gears (there so many pseudo technical blogs on the net) except if it is about using a different gear to make different photos.<br />
I appreciate your opinions on your photos; I would appreciate your opinion on others&#8217;. It&#8217;s good to enter into a photographer&#8217;s mind!<br />
Thank you for this blog, go on, don&#8217;t change too much, keep its spirit as it is.<br />
Kind regards,<br />
Christophe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

