I’m cognizant of the irony that drips from this article’s title, and I’m fully aware of the reality that — without typing a single supporting word — I’ve already written myself into a literary corner. As I see it, my chance of securing your attention beyond this opening paragraph relies on one of two basic human instincts: perversion or curiosity. Specifically, those with a perverse desire to see another man flail about in a self-made paradox are sure to read on, while those with an innate curiosity will likely become so intrigued by the following graphic that they’ll forget all about the title’s inherent self-contradiction:
Few photographers, after examining this flowchart, would opt for anything other than Path 2. Not only does it clearly delay death, but it insures joy and self-actualization to all who choose it. Intriguing, isn’t it? Read on…
Innocence
Amongst those of at least modest financial means, a significant percentage have access to a camera. It might be a cell phone. It might be a simple point-and-shoot. It might be an SLR borrowed from a friend, or even a cardboard disposable purchased for an important occasion. The urge to document a special event, person, or place is a natural tendency that touches all mankind — regardless of one’s political, religious, or social beliefs. For most people, photographs are nothing more than a tangible (though important) realization of a pleasant memory. These are photography’s happy innocents — people who have not tried to make photography into something more than it need be.
Inspiration
Fortunately or unfortunately, some of us choose to leave this utopian garden of innocence. The number of paths leading out are numerous, but they all entice with a common temptation — the desire to take “better” photographs. For some, the inspiration to relinquish innocence is awakened by the arrival of a new love — the birth of a baby, or the addition of a kitten or puppy. For others, it’s precipitated by a once-in-a-lifetime vacation to an exotic locale, or the realization that your child is an athletic prodigy. Perhaps it’s a desire to replace the generic art that hangs from your wall with something of your own creation. For many, it might simply be a case of wanderlust — the seduction of better photographic equipment has tempted many from the garden. Whatever the inspiration, each of us — each on our own separate path — finds a few fleeting moments of newfound photographic happiness along the inspiration trail.
Despair
Inevitably, the trail we each chose to follow — the one that inspired us to leave the garden of innocence — ends suddenly in a thicket of thorny shrubberies at the edge of a precipitous cliff. This is the point at which you have completed your journey of photographic inspiration. You stand alone — expensive camera in hand — with no idea what to photograph next. In a rare moment of self-reflection, each photographer realizes that the path that led here, though inspiring, did not deliver him to his ultimate goal — better photos. You may have taken more photos. You may have taken cleaner, crisper, and sharper photos, but deep down you know that they still aren’t much better than those you took in the garden of innocence.
Exploration
It’s here — facing despair at the end of the inspiration trail — that every photographer ceases to become a traveler and becomes, instead, an explorer. The path that brought you here has ended short of the desired destination and, in order to carry on, you must now forge your own trail. Until now, the journey has been self-guided — but it’s here that photographers must explore the teachings of others if they want to progress. Such guidance may come from many sources: books, forums, friends, or even blogs like this one. The source of the guidance is not nearly as important as its content.
If you study the graphic that begins this article, you’ll see that the exploration stage is critical to every photographer’s journey — the proverbial “fork in the road,” if you will. If you’ve ever wandered through the photography section in a major urban bookstore, you’ve seen photographers who are at this stage of the journey. You’ll find them gathered around the “How-To” section — Lowepro bags, holsters, and backpacks dangling from their shoulders as they thumb through the myriad instructional guides spilling from the shelves. If you’re anything like me, this sight triggers two concurrent thoughts: 1) Maybe I should buy stock in Lowepro, and 2) why aren’t any of these people thumbing through REAL photography books?
Watch carefully, and you’ll see photographers reach over, under, and around each other to extract titles from the shelf: “How to Shoot Landscapes,” “How to Shoot Portraits,” “How to Shoot Macros,” “How to Shoot Black & White,” and the ever-popular “How to Shoot Nudes.” Meanwhile, in an adjacent section of the store — unnoticed and unloved — sit hundreds of books with exquisitely realized depictions of those very same landscapes, portraits, macros, and nudes.
For the benefit of those merely skim-reading, I should warn you that I’ve finally reached the nucleus of this article: My supposition that the path to photographic enlightenment is not paved with “How-To” books — it’s paved with photo collections and photographer monographs.
Seeking guidance in “How-To” books does not enable you, the photographer, to forge your own trail. “How-To” books may inspire you. And they may teach you about something, but they don’t teach you about the most important photographic tool in your bag — yourself. If you don’t know yourself and, in particular, your own soul, how can you hope to become a better photographer?
I would suggest that photographers who seek guidance in their local book seller’s “How-To” section take a few steps further down the aisle — to that unpopulated area labelled “Photography Collections” or “Photographer Monographs” — and just start looking. Even better, pay a visit to your local library. They’re often stocked with thousands of expensive, rare, and out of print photography books — just waiting for perusal.
Photography is not difficult. In fact, it’s one of the simplest things a person can do. Taking a good photograph doesn’t require an extensive amount of technical know-how, complex equipment, or handholding — all it takes is the ability to see. A “How-To” book can not teach you how to see — it can only teach you how to create an image that someone else saw. But photography collections and artist monographs can teach you how to see — because they can show you how someone else chose to photograph the very same things that inspire you.
In spite of my advice, many photographers will still search for direction in “How-To” guides and, as the graphic illustrates, they will remain in Path 1’s infinite loop — unsatisfied, joyless, and seeking inspiration from external sources, rather than from the passion within. The good news is, no matter how many times a photographer repeats the “How-To” cycle, each passage through “despair” yields another chance to escape onto Path 2.
Joy
Studying the works of other photographers helps us to unlock our own inner visual sense. The world is full of many things to see — big, small, chaotic, and quiet. Every person who looks out at this world sees it, feels it, and experiences it differently. The problem, for each of us, is to figure out how to craft a photograph that expresses exactly what it is that we see, feel, or experience. When you explore the work of other photographers, you’ll eventually discover photos that convey objects, thoughts, and emotions that match your own experiences. It’s a moment of liberation that’s nothing short of “joyful.”
Any photographer who’s ever escaped from Path 1’s infinite loop of despair has had at least one such epiphanic moment. Henri Cartier-Bresson frequently credited Martin Munkacsi’s photograph of three boys running toward the breaking surf of Lake Tanganyika as his inspiration for becoming a photographer. In turn, Elliot Erwitt has credited Henri Cartier-Bresson’s 1932 photo of Saint-Bernard Wharf for showing him that photography isn’t about artifice, but about simple observation. It doesn’t matter which photographer or photos inspire you. It doesn’t matter if your inspirational photos are completely different from mine or anyone else’s. It matters only that you find them.
Self-Actualization
In his theory on the Hierarchy of Needs, Abraham Maslow placed self-actualization at the pinnacle — the point at which we humans are the most satisfied. For a photographer, the road to self-actualization begins with a trip into the eye of another. When we see how another photographer has wrestled a shared vision into a compelling photo, it unlocks our creativity and opens our own dormant photographic eye.
Because I have unlimited access to myself, I’ll use me as an example. I have always been a fervent people watcher — keenly aware of body language, appearances, emotions, and circumstance. In my younger days, I often enjoyed nothing more than spending a leisurely afternoon at a busy sidewalk cafe, watching the passing throngs engage in the mere act of being. It was an endless source of fascination yet, even though I was a photographer, it never occurred to me that actual photographs could stem from this most curious “hobby.” It was the work of photographers like Elliott Erwitt, Robert Frank, and Garry Winogrand that opened my eyes. They were the ones who showed me that a photograph didn’t have to be “pretty” to be interesting. They were the ones who showed me that there was actual photographic potential in my favorite pastime. Through them, I realized that photography was a way to show the rest of the world what, exactly, I found so fascinating about the seemingly mundane actions of everyday people.
Without discovering the work of these photographers, I might never have achieved the ultimate photographic desire — “better” pictures. In the process, I learned an equally important lesson — that by satisfying myself, it no longer mattered if others believed that my photographs were “better.” All that mattered was that I knew they were, and that I had satisfied the goal that long-ago pulled me from the garden of innocence.
Death
If a photographer is lucky, he won’t die before he discovers that “How-To” books are not the road to self-actualization. If a photographer is very lucky, he’ll have multiple opportunities to engage in Path 2’s own inherent feedback loop. Photographers are only people. And people, by nature, are never totally satisfied. Each of us knows, no matter how much our photographs improve, that we’ll never be fully content. We know there is always a better photo to be taken, and we’re driven to take it. Prior to death, there is no point in a photographer’s journey where he can’t re-evaluate his direction. Our interests are layered, interwoven, and complex. Sometimes you need to peel away one vision before you have the capacity to explore a deeper one.
As transformative as the aforementioned works of Robert Frank or Garry Winogrand were to my own photography, I did not immediately bond with either of them. It was probably a decade between the time I first looked through Robert Frank’s “The Americans,” and the moment it actually clicked. But when it did finally click, it was more like a lightning bolt than a tap on the shoulder.
There’s never a point where a photographer can’t and shouldn’t return to the exploration stage. New life experiences uncover new passions that, in turn, offer new trails for photographers to forge. Exploration is something that we — not just as photographers, but as people — should never stop doing.
Conclusion
I suspect all those who hoped to witness my struggle with this article’s self-inflicted conundrum have long-ago stopped reading, and are now purchasing the latest “How to Shoot HDR” book. In contrast, those of you whom I’ve successfully distracted with a fancy flowchart and some fuzzy logic might, instead, have embraced the article’s irony and are now searching for new photographic mentors in your local library’s Photographer Monograph section. The only loose end is that, by making this supposition, I’ve made it rather difficult to justify writing my own “How-To” book — too bad, ’cause those babies can be a lucrative source of income!
©2010 grEGORy simpson
ABOUT THESE PHOTOS: “Ob(li)vious” was shot with a Leica M9 digital and a 28mm f/2 Summicron-M lens. “One of Those Days” was photographed with a Leica M9 digital and a v4 35mm f/2 Summicron-M lens. Surely the technical details surrounding the other two images are of no concern.
If you find these photos enjoyable or the articles beneficial, please consider making a DONATION to this site’s continuing evolution. As you’ve likely realized, ULTRAsomething is not an aggregator site — serious time and effort go into developing the original content contained within these virtual walls.
Great post and I really like Ob(li)vious.
I have one how to book but to be honest I can’t get into it. It is more fun to walk around my apartment with my camera trying to make everyday stuff look interesting; or, while driving, to take pictures of the road in front of me at various slow shutter speeds to get interesting light trails. I always wonder how important it is to intellectually grasp certain ideas like tone, shapes, lines, etc vs. just going out into the world and building your intuitive sense of what is compelling.
Amazing article……bravo!\
F.
Great article,
Never got into how-to books, in-fact I self-taught myself how to play the drums, I figured if I took lessons I would just end up with the same techniques and playing style of the tutor, the same I feel applies in photography and I have taught myself for the most part while drawing inspiration from other artists when I hit a wall as we all do from time to time.
Once you have the technical details down such as camera operation and photo editing the next step is to develop your own style, the biggest challenge and learning experience for me has been to give the most mundane and day to day things a different perspective and make them look interesting. This I feel will give me the best possible chance of getting a great shot when I find myself in front of something I actually want to shoot and be successful in doing so.
I agree with Graham, this is a great article, and I hope it will start people thinking about what they photograph. I started the exploration when I realized that I was taking postcard photos, pretty, beautiful, but not distinctive. I discovered I like people and streets, but flowers will tempt so the discovery goes on. The photographer’s eye is the most valuable tool.
But isnt this a »how no to« article too?
marcel, Egor clearly points out the irony of the title in the first sentence of the post.
Nice. Really nice. Got me thinking about and examining my photographic motives, which is a big deal by itself. And hopefully this own-navel examination will help me take better pictures. So many thanks for the insightful article.
I have a book shelf full of Monographs and a few basic “How-To” books or rather general “Theory Books”. I refer to the individual photographer’s work for understanding. My favorite is the Time Book of Photography History and Master Photographers volumes. These opened my eyes. Thanks for the flow chart.
So what is the list of must-have monographs? Or is that a self-exploration exercise as well? I see some greats in your photo in this article (and have many) but I’m interested in your view on this. Thanks.
Thank you..great article.
Everyone: Thanks for your feedback. Nice to know I’m not just writing to the ether.
Dean: You asked if I could recommend some monographs. But you already intuited what my answer would be — that this is a journey every photographer needs to take on his own. Fortunately, it’s a really fun journey! The simple fact is that every person will be moved by a different photographer or subject or style. What sparks my inner proclivities might not spark yours.
In general, I always suggest people start by looking through big photography collections — those that have all manner of photographic subjects, in all sorts of styles, and that cover every era from multiple viewpoints. Most people will usually find a handful of photographs that intrigue them, or that captivate them on some inner level. From there, you can start “zooming in.”
I recently suggested this path to a friend, and he discovered he was drawn to the New Topographers. I suspect this is the same DNA strand that led him, initially, to get a degree in Civil Engineering. It doesn’t matter whether or not I’m drawn to the New Topographers. What matters is that he is — so I’m trying to encourage him to look a bit more at these photographers, and figure out what, precisely, intrigues him. I think, if he wants to explore this area further, that he has some potential — but it’s a difficult path. New Topography isn’t exactly a style that’s going to “wow” your friends and family. It’s a personal journey. My friend is going to have to “wow” himself, first and foremost. This is often the hardest thing — moving beyond the idea that a photograph needs to be a “postcard” (as Lois pointed out in her comment), and that it can actually be something much much more. Many photographers, naturally, desire the accolades of friends and family and, as a result, tend to be pushed into the ‘banal.’ But, if you really and truly want to accomplish something emotionally rewarding, you need to photograph for yourself — and one of the best ways to get over that hump is to seek out the work of photographers who “speak your language,” whatever that language might be.
[…] “How to ignore “How-to” Guides” von Gregory Simpson auf […]
Thanks for re-posting this, Egor. Very welcome, thoughtful piece. I was fortunate to find inspiration at the very beginning of my photography career in 1968 in the work of Fritz Henle. Now very much out of style, he continues to inspire me. Other inspirations have been Robert Doisneau, Elliott Erwitt, B.A. “Tony” King, and Richard W. Brown. Some of these “inspirations” might work for other people, some probably wouldn’t. But they work for me and that’s all that matters (to me).