Carollers are carolling, partiers are partying, and capitalists are capitalizing on the wallet-wresting effects of garish ornamentation mixed with insipid music. Yes, it’s the Holiday season.
We photographers are no less immune to these mawkish manipulations than those who partake in most any other hobby. And it’s quite likely that many of us have already populated our Holiday wish lists with all manner of desirable goods — each of which, we hope, will hasten our ascent to photographic nirvana.
A new camera is likely to top many such lists — a sleek body’s unfamiliar contours and mysterious buttons are a time-tested motivator for photographers seeking renewed inspiration.
Other lists are likely adorned with one or more new lens selections. When we view the world through the altered perspective of a different focal length, all our hackneyed old subjects suddenly appear fresh and compelling.
Clever (i.e. “older”) photographers — who have now shot their usual subjects with 37 different cameras and a lens assortment numbering in the hundreds — will usually add “travel” to their Holiday wish lists. Nothing inspires one to reach for photographic nirvana quite like the experience of having something genuinely new to photograph.
Introspective photographers might feel the urge to add some nice photography monographs to their list. After all, discovering creative new ways to interpret familiar subjects can be every bit as liberating as actually finding new subjects.
So what’s on my photographic Holiday wish list? What’s going to drag my butt up Mount Nirvana?
Clothes.
Yes. That’s right. Clothes. And I’m not talking about such absurd accoutrements as photo vests or those silly harnesses you strap to your body to help secure your camera. I’m talking about your basic, run of the mill, everyday clothing.
Now I must admit that new clothing doesn’t work in quite the same way as a new camera, lens, travel destination or photo book. Those purchases are all designed to cause an effect — better photographs. New clothing, on the other hand, is the result of an effect. Specifically, new clothes are the result of better photography.
Perhaps I should backtrack…
About three months ago, I altered my diet and exercise routine. I stopped eating glutens and significantly reduced my carbohydrate intake. I also added 30 minutes of aerobic and anaerobic exercises to my daily workout routine, thus increasing it to… well… 30 minutes.
Curiously, I didn’t do this because I considered myself to be either unfit or overweight. Over the last two decades, I gained about a pound a year — a nearly imperceptible rate of change, and one which I readily dismissed as “the inevitable result of aging.” Cloaked in such denial, it would obviously require a rather potent impetus for me to willingly forgo such indulgences as bread, beer, pasta and pastry — and that impetus was migraines.
For over 30 years, I’ve suffered through frequent, protracted and debilitating migraines. Every new pill, procedure, lifestyle change or bottle of snake oil gets my rapt attention. So when I read that a common benefit of a gluten-free diet was a reduction in the frequency and severity of migraines, I took action.
Within days of my gluten banishment, a strange thing happened: the digital readout on my bathroom scale began to display steadily declining numbers. Suspecting a faulty battery, I swapped it for a new one. The decline continued. Encouraged by this and by an increase in my energy levels, I started reading some health and nutrition books. One in particular, called Grain Brain, filled me with a terror far greater than any horror novel, and provided the necessary incentive to stick to my routine during those early days. Soon, it wasn’t fear that motivated me, but success. I grew lighter, healthier and happier. And as I did, I would go out for increasingly longer photo walks. No neighbourhood was too far; no day too rainy; no morning too foggy; no night too dark and cold. I realized how lazy I had recently become, and how this laziness translated into a lessened and compromised photographic output.
It took two decades of denial and ignorance for my weight to peak at a full 9 pounds above a healthy, normal BMI range — a statistic I spent the last year leniently assuming meant I was “just barely overweight.” In contrast, it’s taken a mere three months for me to lose 15 pounds, which puts me back comfortably within the “acceptable” BMI range for my age and height. But as with most things I undertake, “acceptable” isn’t good enough when “superlative” is within reach. And “superlative,” according to an amalgamation of various ideal-weight formulas, means I still need to lose another 10 pounds — which, when achieved, will put me at the same weight I was at in my early-20’s.
I felt pretty darn good in my early-20’s. Looked good too… had endurance in spades…
Making these lifestyle changes has been ridiculously easy. And the benefits — not just to my photography, but to my overall well-being — are demonstrable. Going gluten-free has eradicated my excess weight, eliminated my frequent and varied collection of digestive “issues,” and infused me with enough energy to grab a camera, head out the door and take the time to explore and experiment. The only real problem is my clothing. Nothing fits me anymore. At least not the way I intended. My tailored shirts billow and flap about like a tarp in a hurricane. My tight rock ’n roll jeans have gone hip hop — slipping south of my waist, where they’re now held aloft only by the remnants of my butt and a belt cinched to its minimum circumference. Its excess length wags before me, to-and-fro, like some sort of leather dowsing rod. In another few weeks, I won’t even be able to pull off the “hip hop” look. Instead, I’ll be sporting the “senile old man with his pants around his ankles” look…
In fact, the only thing that my new gluten-free lifestyle hasn’t improved upon is the very thing that inspired it — the migraines. They seem, thus far, to be relatively unaffected. But in spite of this, I still feel as if I’ve stumbled upon the fountain of youth. Which is good because, if I live forever, the odds I might one day take a decent photograph increase substantially… and all it would have required is some new clothes.
ABOUT THESE PHOTOS: “Affirmation” was shot with an Olympus OM-D E-M1 with a Lumix/Leica DG Summilux 25mm f/1.4 lens. “Undulate,” another example of my continuing diptych compulsion, was shot with an Olympus Pen FT and an Olympus 25mm f/4 lens on Kentmere 100, exposed at ISO 50 and developed 1:50 in Rodinal. “Flashers” was taken on one of those foggy mornings mentioned in the article. It was shot using a Hasselblad XPan with a Hasselblad 90mm f/4 lens on FP4+, exposed at ISO 250 and developed in Diafine. “Fountains” — another diptych, this time chosen for its sheer blatancy — was shot using an Olympus Pen FT with an Olympus 38mm f/1.8 lens on Tri-X, exposed at ISO 1000 and developed in Diafine.
If you find these photos enjoyable or the articles beneficial, please consider making a DONATION to this site’s continuing evolution. As you’ve likely realized, ULTRAsomething is not an aggregator site — serious time and effort go into developing the original content contained within these virtual walls.
Gregory, good for you, congrats! highly motivating, when you see those numbers dropping. tough to stay the course when you get in maintenance mode, hope you make it and you get back to tell us how you did it. looking forward. in the meantime, I’ll read the book. and go back out there to make more images!
Hi, way to go – now as a fellow 48 years old (?!) – earlier this year I started to increase my work time from two weekend to (nominal) 20hs/week in daycare (as a nurse) in Hamburg, Germany moving from patients to patients by bicycle that means between 300-600km / month…. I probably have not lost weight but waistline. Great good feeling… I just feel fit, driving my bike to an average of 25-30km/h gobbling calories as they come (no diet possible) mostly organic though.
I cannot yet see an effect on my photography, available time has always been more important than my weight 😉 I believe.
Nice pictures by the wy, live the subtle but distinct grain!
Rolf
G,
Congrats, there are few things as satisfying as feeling as strong and sharp as you had 20 years ago!
There is a certain blunting that takes place due to diet, stress or perhaps just the passing of time…regardless this is an encouraging post at the time of year many of us are reflective. Looking to create a spark, change or reinvent ourselves.
Is Diafine the new Rodinal?
How are you scanning the Xpan negs? *envy*
Can we anticipate a signature review of your OMD EM1?
Thank-you for providing the continued quirky if sometimes obliquely related photo content. 😉
Hi Aaron: Nice to hear from you again. Funny, I just finished off my last bag of some Ethical Bean coffee this morning… in response to your questions:
1. I’ve been using Diafine on and off since I got back into film. I like it for the same reasons I like Rodinal: Specifically, I like it because I’m cheap. Like Rodinal, it has a shelf life measured in aeons. And also like Rodinal, one batch develops more rolls than I can count. In the case of Rodinal, I only use 6ml per roll, so the bottle seems bottomless. In the case of Diafine, it’s completely reusable, allowing me to bathe roll-after-roll in the same solution, year-after-year. Plus, Diafine has a pushing effect, allowing me to save money by not purchasing high ISO film — I just double (or triple) the box speed of my usual films and develop them in Diafine.
2. I’ve been “scanning” Xpan and Widelux negatives by shooting them with my Ricoh GXR+50mm macro module. I shoot two frames per negative and let Photoshop auto-stitch the two halves of the negative together. It works very well. Interestingly, I thought the “scans” would improve once I started shooting them with the E-M1 and a 60mm macro, but that hasn’t been the case. In fact, I actually have a slight preference for the GXR scans over the OMD scans… that’s not to say the Olympus is bad. It’s just that the Ricoh is that good. Here’s a little secret — For the past few months I’ve been “scanning” everything with my old Ricoh GXR. Although my Plustek scanner yields slightly better image quality, the fact I can use the GXR to “scan” a roll in a few minutes instead of a few hours means the Plustek is now gathering dust. Originally, I’d planned to use the Plustek to rescan any image that demanded the ultimate fidelity, but anyone who’s seen my photos knows there’s absolutely nothing about them that requires ultimate fidelity.
3. I can’t think of anything more boring (for me or my readers) that writing a review of a modern digital camera… particularly one that’s already been written about by a couple of hundred thousand other photo bloggers. It works exactly like you would expect, and is thus the dullest camera I own. Essentially, I got it for those occasions when society dictates I take a photo that’s actually in focus. Fortunately, as you can tell by the top photo in this article, I was able to bend the camera to my will…
Gregory.
You sweet talker! I need to get your another bag-it is Christmas and all.
Diafine. It comes on the radar every so often and I’ve been intrigued to try it. I had been riding the Rodinal/HC110 merry go round for much the same reasons (infinite longevity) but never LOVED the results. I’ve had it in my head that XTOL is the holy grail of developers but alas I develop far too little film to be whipping up a batch of that.
Diafine and it’s purported speed bump seem perfect for the winter months.
Very interesting comment on the macro lens scanning technique. I have graduated to a Coolscan but let’s be honest, it is a slow way to go at the best of times…the results are excellent and Digital ICE for colour and slides is the closest thing to magic I’ve ever seen. I like to hear that the GXR continues to get use-I love the championing of slightly out of date, very much forgotten tools that continue to delight.
And that is the reason for my selfish request for an OMD report. I’m sure there are many other reviews that very thoroughly review them BUT that’s all far too practical a pursuit…read review, buy camera. Horrors. I have bought less than 1% of all the reviews I’ve enjoyed.
I love to sit with the tension, the promise of the new. Of how it might fit into being the perfect companion to take…wherever I might dream to go.
Your delightful article on the Rollei 35 has served such a purpose-thank-you-and I wring my hands at the thought of what might be (shooting street in Montreal on a quick weekend with my honey?) and perhaps eventual acquisition but c’mon a pricey, zone focus 35mm camera in 2014?! But let’s be honest, as we both know rational has nothing to do with it. 🙂
Hmmm… Might be what I need.